Who to Believe? The TSA or Passengers Still Stuck on No-Fly List?

The TSA tells us that now they are in charge of deciding who can and can not fly (instead of the individual airlines as was previously the case) there is greater consistency and efficiency in matching passenger names against no fly security lists.

The TSA also says that 99% of passengers suffering from a name similar to a terrorist name can solve the problem by getting a ‘redress’ number that makes the former problem a non-issue.  Details here.

But.

We had also been told, earlier, by the TSA that the reason we now have to advise our date of birth and gender every time we fly is so they can better screen us against possible terrorists with similar names and easily eliminate obvious mismatches such as very young children, senior citizens, and people of the wrong gender.  This seems sensible and understandable, doesn’t it.

So how can we reconcile these preceding two statements with

this account
of a six year old girl who ended up on the no fly list?  Surely this should never happen when the TSA already knows this is a 6 year old girl (or have 6 yr old girls now started committing acts of international terrorism against airlines?).

Alas, it seems that the date of birth/gender data is being completely ignored.  And as for the claim about 99% of passengers with a problem being able to solve the problem with a redress number, that doesn’t seem to be happening either.

So – who to believe?  The TSA?  Or the 6 yr old girl and her family.

2 thoughts on “Who to Believe? The TSA or Passengers Still Stuck on No-Fly List?”

  1. Considering that most travelers flying within the U.S. use a driver’s license for I.D., why can’t TSA have readers to scan them. Most driver’s licenses have either a magnetic stripe or a barcode that contains various information about the driver, including the physical description of the driver.
    If a TSA screener could swipe the card, it could than run the name, birth date, description, and address against the watch list and get either a yea or nay as to subjecting the passenger to extra scrutiny.
    Most police cars are equiped with card swipers, so the officer doesn’t have to input by hand data from the license. Drug stores such as Walgreen’s and Osco/Super Valu now have swimping devices, so that paperwork for regulated OTC cold medication doesn’t have to be completed by hand.
    This shouldn’t be that big of a technology step. Some airports now have scanners to read boarding pass bar codes, to prevent terrorists from creating fake boarding passes to get around the watch lists.

  2. Pingback: Security Roundup week ending 2 July 2010 » The Travel Insider

Leave a Reply

Scroll to Top

Free Weekly Emailed Newsletter

Usually weekly, since 2001, we publish a roundup of travel and travel related technology developments, and often a feature article too.

You’ll stay up to date with the latest and greatest (and cautioned about the worst) developments.  You’ll get information to help you choose and become a better informed traveler and consumer, how to best use new technologies, and at times, will learn of things that might entertain, amuse, annoy or even outrage you.

We’re very politically incorrect and love to point out the unrebutted hypocrisies and unfairnesses out there.

This is all entirely free (but you’re welcome to voluntarily contribute!), and should you wish to, easy to cancel.

We’re not about to spam you any which way and as you can see, we don’t ask for any information except your email address and how often you want to receive our newsletters.

Newsletter Signup - Welcome!

Thanks for choosing to receive our newsletters.  We hope you’ll enjoy them and become a long-term reader, and maybe on occasion, add comments and thoughts of your own to the newsletters and articles we publish.

We’ll send you a confirmation email some time in the next few days to confirm your email address, and when you reply to that, you’ll then be on the list.

All the very best for now, and welcome to the growing “Travel Insider family”.






David.