Supersonic Business Jets get closer to reality

Two companies – Gulfstream and Aerion – have announced new developments bringing them closer to a viable design for a supersonic business jet, although neither company has yet committed to developing and producing such a plane.

There are several obstacles to be overcome in designing a viable supersonic jet.  Such a plane would need to be cost effective, and would need to be able to fly economically at both subsonic and supersonic speeds.

Most of all, the ‘Holy Grail’ of supersonic design is to come up with a plane that has an unobtrusive  and inoffensive sonic boom.  Currently, most countries prohibit planes from flying at supersonic speeds overhead, due to concerns (be they imaginary or real) about the impact of sonic booms.  Gulfstream say they are “getting real close” to all of the requirements for an aircraft to meet a perceived noise level of 70dB  while flying supersonic over land, and are lobbying international regulators (the ICAO) to get this set as a standard for acceptable sonic boom noise levels.

The noise threshold, which Gulfstream and NASA came to independently, can be compared to closing a good car door or a refrigerator. 


The Gulfstream jet would cruise at Mach 1.7, which is about twice the speed of typical passenger jets at present.  This does not mean that flight times would be halved.  Flights would still be subject to all the normal taxi time and ground delays, and all planes operating below 10,000 feet are required to fly no faster than 250 miles an hour.  In other words, a flight that is currently timed to take about one hour from engine start to engine stop would probably still take one hour.  But a five hour flight might reduce to three hours, and a 10 hour flight might reduce to 5 1/2 hours.


Here is an interesting article, although fairly technical.

1 thought on “Supersonic Business Jets get closer to reality”

  1. Um, what are the chances of Gulfstream and Nasa actually arriving at the same noise threshold “independently”?
    And what does cost effective mean in this context? Aerion says its offering, if developed, would cost around $80 million each, in an 8-passenger configuration. Gulp.

Leave a Reply

Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top

Free Weekly Emailed Newsletter

Usually weekly, since 2001, we publish a roundup of travel and travel related technology developments, and often a feature article too.

You’ll stay up to date with the latest and greatest (and cautioned about the worst) developments.  You’ll get information to help you choose and become a better informed traveler and consumer, how to best use new technologies, and at times, will learn of things that might entertain, amuse, annoy or even outrage you.

We’re very politically incorrect and love to point out the unrebutted hypocrisies and unfairnesses out there.

This is all entirely free (but you’re welcome to voluntarily contribute!), and should you wish to, easy to cancel.

We’re not about to spam you any which way and as you can see, we don’t ask for any information except your email address and how often you want to receive our newsletters.

Newsletter Signup - Welcome!

Thanks for choosing to receive our newsletters.  We hope you’ll enjoy them and become a long-term reader, and maybe on occasion, add comments and thoughts of your own to the newsletters and articles we publish.

We’ll send you a confirmation email some time in the next few days to confirm your email address, and when you reply to that, you’ll then be on the list.

All the very best for now, and welcome to the growing “Travel Insider family”.